packed_meeting_against_mayfields

Packed meeting condemns Mayfields

Mayfield Market Towns was roundly slammed last night – condemned by MPs, Councils and wildlife charities alike.

Despite beautiful barbeque weather and a lure of a World Cup match, around 500 people crammed into St Paul’s Catholic College Hall in Burgess Hill for the Public Meeting. There were so many people, that the hall was filled to capacity and some had to listen from outside. mayfields_public_meeting_2

The panel of speakers included Arundel and Downs MP, Nick Herbert; Mid Sussex MP, Nicholas Soames; Mid Sussex District Councillor, Norman Webster; Hosham District Councillor, Brian O’Connell; Founder of LAMBS, Anthony Watts Williams; Chief Executive of the Sussex Wildlife Trust, Dr Tony Whitbread; Dr Roger Smith, Sussex CPRE and Kenneth MacIntosh from Hands Off Henfield.


Lambs-Meeting-4207
Nick Herbert told the crowd of his frustration with Mayfields’ persistence against a wall of local opposition and the obvious unsuitability of the site.

– Nick Herbert MP

The Mayfield proposal has no local support,” he said. “It does not have the support of the local District Councils, it certainly does not have the support of the local Parish Councils and I can assure you it does not have the support of either of the local Members of Parliament.”

“It is on Greenfield land – Greenfield land that, as we saw over the winter, is prone to flooding… and it is nowhere near a railway station. With absurd pretence this company has suggested that most people in this new town of 10,000 houses will work within the town. We know that’s not true that’s nonsense – what will happen is that they will get into their cars and drive to work.”

“This is therefore an entirely unsustainable proposal that will not fulfil the conditions for a new town, garden town, Garden City – call it what you will. It is an unsustainable proposal that will not pass any of the tests.”

Mid Sussex MP, Nicholas Soames followed Mr Herbert with an attack on the underhand tactics Mayfields has employed in a desperate bid to win support for its scheme.

– Nicholas Soames MP

These people will stop at literally nothing,” he said. “They have lobbied every Councillor – they’ve been after them, they’ve tried to get them to meet them and to talk to them. But they won’t have it – our Councillors are rock solid on this, and know perfectly well that this is the wrong proposal, from the wrong people at the wrong time.”

Mr Soames also stressed the importance of supporting the LAMBS campaign against Mayfields.

“Together we have a more than fighting chance to see this off.” He said, but he warned it could take some time.

Planning Councillors Norman Webster and Brian O’Connell said both District Councils had dismissed the London-based company and did not support Mayfields’ new town scheme.

Mid Sussex does not support this proposal,” said Mr Webster. “It is not in our district plan which has a bottom up approach and has widespread local political support. It is not supported locally by Neighbourhood Plans either. It is developer led by a national company, and we see it giving no benefit to the local area.”

Speaking for Horsham District Council, Mr O’Connell expressed his frustration at the way Mayfields has presented its plans.

We have made provision for the houses we think we need in the Horsham District for the next 20 years, and that does not include Mayfields,” he said. “We did look at their policies briefly; they claim there are no objections from Statutory Consultees, but this is only because the variable in their planning makes it difficult to assess the impact on things like transport and flooding. But this is because the environment agency, the highways agency and West Sussex County Council cannot assess the impacts due to lack of information.”

Mayfields proposed 10,000 home settlement would have a devastating impact on the thriving village of Henfield, which has already suffered considerably at the hands of the Government Planning Inspectorate. Most recently, the Inspector overturned a local planning decision by giving the go ahead for 160 houses on a greenfield site in West End Lane.

Kenneth MacIntosh from Hands off Henfield warned people not to rely on Neighbourhood Plans to protect their villages and countryside. He urged people to get behind their local MPs to secure more democracy in planning issues.

Mr Herbert told the crowd he would be calling on the government to abolish the Planning Inspectorate;

When the Infrastructure Bill comes to the house of commons,” he said, “I intend to table an amendment. I know that I will have Nicholas’s support and I suspect I will have the support of a very large number of fellow members of Parliament to abolish the Planning Inspectorate and to say actually the decision should be taken democratically.”


nick_herbert_condemns_mayfields
mayfields_public_meeting_3

 

4 Responses to Packed meeting condemns Mayfields

  1. John Howie 22nd June 2014 at 9:46 am #

    Excellent meeting, great support, and unanimous condemnation of Mayfields, it’s proposals, and particularly the methods by which it is going about its appalling scheme.
    Devious, dishonest, and a bare-faced money grab, by very cheap people with no morals or consideration for anything or anyone, apart from their bank accounts.
    The laughable irony is that Peter Freeman was praised by the Wolfson Commission for his submission with regard to consideration for local sentiment and popularity, yet in the face of total opposition to his Mayfields, he is trying to get it forced on us by government diktat from above. The gall of the man, and the total dishonesty of his ‘modus operandi’
    How do these people live with themselves.
    I urge all LAMBS followers and any others who object to Mayfields to write to Cameron, Osborne, Boles, and Pickles – they’ll soon get the message.

  2. victoria 24th June 2014 at 8:08 pm #

    Please sign and share this petition on Facebook and Twitter/ Email to save this precious environment where you live.

    http://Bit.ly/1rcq7E2

    OR

    https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/stop-two-lords-from-building-10-000-houses-on-rural-sussex-land

  3. Larry 30th June 2014 at 3:13 pm #

    What a bunch of miserable bald and grey haired NIMBYs.

    Perhaps they should consider if their own homes (built on once green fields) would exist if their parents had campaigned against their construction.

  4. Nicholas Jones 1st July 2014 at 1:07 pm #

    I attended the meeting on 20th June. Total condemnation for a ridiculous proposal that does nothing to alleviate immediate housing need but totally devastates out valuable countryside.
    One member of the audience viewed the opinion that new towns should be built in the North of England where jobs and houses are needed, land is in greater supply, and not in the South which is overcrowded and has some of the lowest levels of unemployment in the country. Someone speaking with sense, lets hope the MP’s express those well supported views to their government who is doing little to take the pressure off the South with its London centric approach to everything!

© 2013 LAMBS
LAMBS does not accept any responsibility for any external links from this site.
Content is copyright to the respective owners.