Horsham_District_Council_2

A bad omen for Mayfields?

The Examination of Horsham’s District Plan began on Tuesday morning within hours of yet more flooding on Mayfield’s proposed High Street in Wineham.

And it appears that the weather was a bad omen for Mayfields because within the next three days the LAMBS campaign had received two big boosts. The first was the news that MPs Nicholas Soames and Nick Herbert have requested permission to speak against Mayfields at the Examination, the second that LAMBS’ barrister has been invited to support the District Council, giving him the best opportunity to challenge Mayfields’ proposals.

Horsham Council Chamber

Scrutiny of the council’s housing plan began on Tuesday with a lively debate over the amount of future housing needed in the Horsham district.

The hearing so far has been largely about numbers, with Horsham’s planning officers defending a house building figure of 650 per year against a wall of developers clamouring for more. By far the biggest claims came from Mayfields who lost no time in trying to discredit the Council by number crunching employment and migration figures to justify a call for 975 new homes per year.

On Thursday morning Mayfields joined forces with three other developers to issue a Statement of Common Ground which contained a barrage of facts and figures designed to push up the District’s housing requirement. By Thursday afternoon the Inspector, Geoff Salter appeared to be yielding to the pressure and the Council’s housing figure was creeping towards 730, but was still a long way from what Mayfields would need to build a new town.

Listen to Jane Watson’s audio report on the Horsham hearings

There had been fears that Mr Salter would rule that the plan was “unsound” and suspend the examination, but he stated that he had no intentions of doing so without hearing all the evidence.

I could just go home tonight and send a letter saying that the exam is suspended,” he said. “But I’ve got to resolve this – that is why I am spending time on it and giving everyone a chance to give their opinion. That is why I have decided to proceed, but clearly there are a lot of diverging opinions here.

LAMBS Chairman, Geoff Zeidler who was at the hearing says that although it was a challenging day for Horsham District Council, Mayfields gained very little ground in the discussions.

At the end of the day it was felt that there was nothing that significantly reflected a material step that advanced MMT’s case,” he says. “And there was much discussion about distributed deliverability and sustainability which could counter it”.

Caption here

Nick Herbert, MP for Arundel and South Downs and Sir Nicholas Soames, MP for Mid Sussex, have both asked the Planning Inspector if they can speak against Mayfield’s proposal for a new 10,000 home settlement between Sayers Common and Henfield.

LAMBS will not be back at the three week examination until November 18th when Inspector is dedicating half a day to considering the New Market Town option. Mid Sussex MP, Nicholas Soames and Arundel and South Downs MP, Nick Herbert have asked to appear before the Inspector on that day to speak against Mayfields’ proposals.

LAMBS barrister, Richard Turney will be adding his weight to Council’s arguments armed with all the evidence collected by the LAMBS team over the past six months.

“I believe he will be in a position to be as effective as if he was independently representing LAMBS,” says Geoff Zeidler.

caption here

Wineham has seen flooding for the second time in less than a month in the area identified by Mayfields for their new town site.

2 Responses to A bad omen for Mayfields?

  1. Jim Simon on Facebook 8th November 2014 at 9:18 pm #

    I said this in an earlier comment, but, as a further weapon this coming week, given that devolution within England is such a potential election lever for whoever wants it, any further big housing development that strengthens the pull of the South East in the next 20 years or so might either involve building where there will be less need than some think or encouraging an undesirable pull away from elsewhere (Manchester/Leeds/Birmingham/Liverpool etc) in direct conflict with National strategic plans, or both.
    Quite apart from the craziness of the idea in the first place… I just don’t understand how it’s got as far as this, but I guess by being a bit vague and dippy about it Mayfield has prevented anything being concrete enough to formally dismiss, thus ensuring it makes it to some sort of arbitration where it does stand a chance because the Inspector will be from UK Central.

  2. Christine Bailey 8th November 2014 at 10:03 pm #

    Well done for all the work you’re doing to try to stop this terrible incursion into our countryside. I hope and pray that common sense will prevail and that Mayfields ridiculous plan will fail but I won’t hold my breath as localism seems to be totally forgotten at the moment.

© 2013 LAMBS
LAMBS does not accept any responsibility for any external links from this site.
Content is copyright to the respective owners.